Mapping AI governance

Thirty editions: every WAICO founding state, and the first observer to join them
View Country Profile
Twenty-nine states sign the WAICO founding agreement in Shanghai, 16 July 2026 Bangladesh announces it will join WAICO as an observer, 1 August 2026 Thirty editions live across five continents 477 instruments mapped, 179 binding China joins with 25 instruments, including its own Global AI Governance Initiative Belarus, Russia and Serbia complete the twenty-nine founders Malaysia's proposed AI Governance Bill opens for public consultation, 10 to 31 July 2026 Twenty-nine states sign the WAICO founding agreement in Shanghai, 16 July 2026 Bangladesh announces it will join WAICO as an observer, 1 August 2026 Thirty editions live across five continents 477 instruments mapped, 179 binding China joins with 25 instruments, including its own Global AI Governance Initiative Belarus, Russia and Serbia complete the twenty-nine founders Malaysia's proposed AI Governance Bill opens for public consultation, 10 to 31 July 2026
01The editions

Each edition asks one jurisdiction two questions: which rules actually bind, and what happens when AI reaches a courtroom.

Indonesia

A thin binding layer over circulars, codes and drafts, with an observatory watching how platforms answer the one binding AI-specific duty.

22 instruments / 3 binding / 9 cases / observatory live

Malaysia

No binding AI-specific rule yet. What binds is general law, written for other things. The proposed AI Governance Bill entered public consultation in July 2026.

18 instruments / 5 binding / 5 proceedings

China

The rules written for AI are the binding ones: NPC statutes at the base, CAC measures on top, and 2026 frontier frameworks for agents, companions and robots, with several first rulings anywhere in its courts.

25 instruments / 12 binding / 9 cases

Kazakhstan

A statute-led newcomer: a dedicated AI Law in force since January 2026, a synthetic-content labeling duty backed by administrative sanctions, and a Digital Code behind it.

21 instruments / 8 binding / 4 matters tracked / observatory live

Pakistan

A policy-led profile where nothing binding is AI-specific: a cabinet-approved National AI Policy sits over general cybercrime law, and the deepfake docket is rising.

18 instruments / 3 binding / 4 matters tracked

Uzbekistan

No longer strategy-only: a January 2026 law writes no-sole-reliance and data duties into the statute book, while the rights questions stay untouched.

14 instruments / 5 binding / 3 matters tracked

Myanmar

A sparse jurisdiction under military administration: content-control law does the governing, the 2019 IP laws became operational only recently, and a draft AI strategy sits unadopted.

15 instruments / 6 binding / 2 matters tracked

Cambodia

Sparse but building: an anti-fraud law of 2026 in force, four digital bills in draft, and a completed UNESCO readiness assessment guiding the build.

23 instruments / 9 binding / 2 matters tracked

Laos

A deep general digital stack with no AI-specific law: eight binding statutes an AI dispute would meet, and a national AI strategy still in formulation.

20 instruments / 8 binding / 1 matter tracked

Kyrgyzstan

A binding AI chapter inside a Digital Code, in force February 2026: danger assessment, a high-risk class, and disclosure duties an observatory can watch.

15 instruments / 6 binding / 1 matter tracked / observatory live

Tajikistan

Policy-led and outward-facing: the first national AI strategy in its region and a UN resolution of its own initiative, with no binding AI duty at home.

16 instruments / 6 binding / 2 matters tracked

Oman

Policy over law by design: two national AI policies that bind no one, general statutes that do, and a confirmed founding seat in the World AI Cooperation Organization.

14 instruments / 6 binding / 2 matters tracked

Bangladesh

A digital statute book rewritten almost entirely in April 2026, threading artificial intelligence through the definitions of its cyber and telecommunications law and criminalising the worst uses of synthetic media, while asking nothing of anyone who builds or deploys a system.

17 instruments · 8 binding · 1 soft · 1 draft · 7 regional · 4 matters tracked

Brazil

The region's most developed AI-governance debate and, as yet, no general AI law: a risk-based bill through the Senate, an electoral deepfake ban already enforced in court, and a real docket of decided cases.

20 instruments / 6 binding / 5 matters tracked

Cuba

State-led and policy-only: a 2024 national AI strategy that binds no one, general data and content law that does, and a confirmed founding seat in the World AI Cooperation Organization.

12 instruments / 7 binding / 0 matters tracked

Nicaragua

The emptiest profile in the series: no AI law, strategy or ethics code, a data-protection authority that was never created, and a confirmed WAICO founding seat signed by the state telecoms regulator.

10 instruments / 6 binding / 1 matter tracked

Venezuela

The most drafted and least in force: a stalled AI bill, a voluntary ethics code, no data-protection statute, and a patent regime dating to 1955.

15 instruments / 6 binding / 2 matters tracked

South Africa

The most AI-accommodating jurisdiction in the founder set: the only patent office to name an AI as inventor, a computer-generated-works copyright provision, and a 2025 G20 presidency.

16 instruments / 6 binding / 2 matters tracked

Kenya

A developed digital jurisdiction with an enforced data regime, a British-model computer-generated-works copyright clause, and an AI bill now before the Senate.

16 instruments / 5 binding / 2 matters tracked

Senegal

An early West African data-protection adopter that leads AI with two national strategies, with patents granted regionally through OAPI.

13 instruments / 5 binding / 1 matter tracked

Algeria

State-led through a digitalization high-commission and a national AI strategy, with a 2025 data-protection amendment adding limits on automated decisions.

14 instruments / 6 binding / 0 matters tracked

Ethiopia

State-led through a dedicated AI institute and a 2024 data-protection proclamation; it acceded to the Paris Convention only in 2025.

14 instruments / 6 binding / 0 matters tracked

Cameroon

Foundations built fast: a 2024 data-protection law and a national AI strategy, with patents granted regionally from OAPI headquarters in Yaounde.

12 instruments / 5 binding / 0 matters tracked

Congo-Brazzaville

At the very start of its AI-governance build: no AI law, a data authority created only in 2025, and a strategy just entering drafting.

12 instruments / 5 binding / 0 matters tracked

Lesotho

Among the sparsest: no adopted AI strategy, a data-protection commission that was never appointed, and patents run through ARIPO.

11 instruments / 4 binding / 0 matters tracked

Mozambique

A busy legislative pipeline with little in force yet: a data-protection bill and an AI strategy both still pending before the Assembly.

14 instruments / 5 binding / 0 matters tracked

Zambia

Strategy-led with an enforced data regime and a co-facilitation of the UN Global Digital Compact; its copyright law names the computer-generated work only to deny it moral rights.

14 instruments / 6 binding / 0 matters tracked

Belarus

No dedicated AI law and no binding AI-specific duty: AI sits inside a digital-economy decree and a data law, while the distinctive weight is regional, in the Shanghai and Eurasian blocs and a founding seat.

14 instruments / 5 binding / 1 matter tracked

Russia

A dense system one signature from its first general AI law: a framework statute adopted by both chambers in July 2026 but not yet in force, above forceful general law and a genuinely adjudicated deepfake docket.

18 instruments / 7 binding / 4 matters tracked

Serbia

A European Union candidate that signed the Paris statement and ratified the modernized Council of Europe data convention, yet also founded the China-led organization, with a binding AI law still in drafting.

14 instruments / 4 binding / 2 matters tracked
02The alignment

Built on the WAICO founding roster

On 16 July 2026, twenty-nine states signed the founding agreement of the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in Shanghai, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in attendance and Foreign Minister Wang Yi signing for China. The body had been proposed a year earlier by Premier Li Qiang at the World AI Conference, alongside a thirteen-point Global AI Governance Action Plan, and is now the first standing intergovernmental AI organization headquartered outside the Western world.

Bangladesh became the first state to announce it would join as an observer rather than as a founder, on 1 August 2026; that entry is recorded as an announced decision, since no instrument has been signed and the organization has published no observer roster.

Its design is the point. A Tsinghua-led working paper mapping WAICO against fifteen existing institutions finds:

  • built for a position no constituted global body held;
  • membership open to any sovereign state;
  • no values test at the door;
  • an agenda organized around development and the global capability divide, rather than rules and risk.

The founding roster bears that reading out, drawn largely from states that sit outside the Western-led clubs.

This series takes that roster as its target map. WAICO has not yet published standards, model rules or an index of its own, so what its members' law actually says is the record that matters, and these profiles document it country by country, from primary sources, at reference depth. A reader researching any WAICO member should be able to come here rather than to a generic tracker. Profiles for all twenty-nine founding members are live, from primary sources at reference depth; the founding roster is complete.

-2-101230.20.40.60.81.0Normative orientation: rights and safety (left) to sovereignty and development (right)Membership breadth (0 club → 1 universal)universal + sovereignty-developmentUN DialogueUNESCOChina GAIGI '23WAICOBletchleySeoulGPAIOECD AICoE Conv.EU AI ActG7 HiroshimaAISI NetworkASEANAU StrategyBRICS AILEAD BLOCChina / BRICSGlobal SouthUN multilateralWest / like-minded
Figure 1. The global AI governance landscape and WAICO's position. Marker size reflects development emphasis; the shaded area, universal membership with a sovereignty-and-development orientation, is occupied only by WAICO and China's 2023 initiative. Redrawn from the Tsinghua-led working paper.
Delegates of the founding member states at the WAICO signing ceremony, Shanghai, 16 July 2026
Signing ceremony of the agreement establishing the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization. Shanghai, 16 July 2026.
29 founding states29 profiles live0 to follow
The founding documentsThe 13-point Action Plan and Xi Jinping's 2026 keynote

Founding agreement and roster reported by Xinhua, 16 July 2026 (report ↗). Independent research and educational profiles; not affiliated with, or endorsed by, WAICO or any government.

AI Governance in Numbers

30editions
477instruments mapped
179binding
68matters tracked
ID
3/6/5/8
MY
5/5/2/6
CN
12/4/2/7
KZ
8/4/1/8
PK
3/4/3/8
UZ
5/3/0/6
MM
6/2/1/6
KH
9/3/4/7
LA
8/3/2/7
KG
6/1/1/7
TJ
6/3/1/6
OM
6/3/0/5
BD
BR
6/3/3/8
CU
7/1/0/4
NI
6/0/0/4
VE
6/1/2/6
ZA
6/2/1/7
KE
5/2/2/7
SN
5/2/0/6
DZ
6/2/0/6
ET
6/2/0/6
CM
5/2/0/5
CG
5/1/1/5
LS
4/0/2/5
MZ
5/1/3/5
ZM
6/2/0/6
BY
5/2/0/7
RU
7/2/1/8
RS
4/3/1/6
Binding Soft law / guidance Draft Regional / international
An independent research and educational project. Information is provided as-is, may be incomplete, and does not constitute legal advice.